6.5 KiB
(Chapter 8, STAT 1040)
Correlation
Scatter Diagrams
A scatter diagram or scatter plot shows the relationship between two variables. One variable is on the X axis, the other on the Y axis.
If a scatter diagram is football shaped, it can be summarized using the 5-number summary:
Variable | Description |
---|---|
\bar{x} |
The average of the set graphed along the X axis |
\sigma_x |
The standard deviation of set graphed along the X axis |
\bar{y} |
The average of the set graphed along the Y axis |
\sigma_y |
The standard deviation of the set graphed along the Y axis |
r |
The correlation coefficient, or how closely clustered the datapoints are in a line |
The intersection of the averages of x and y will be the center of an oval shaped scatter diagram. Draw lines 2\sigma
(will contain ~95% of all data) from the center along each axis to generalize the shape of a scatter plot.
You can approximate the mean by trying to find the upper bound and the lower bound of 2\sigma
deviation to either side of the mean, then finding the middle of those two points to find \bar{x}
. You can divide the range between the two points by 4 to find \sigma
.
Association
- Positive association is demonstrated when the dots are trend upward as
x
increases (r
is positive). - Negative association is demonstrated when the the dots trend downward as
x
increases (r
is negative). - Strong association is demonstrated when dots are clustered tightly together along a line (
|r|
is closer to 1). - Weak association is demonstrated when dots are not clustered tightly. (
|r|
is closer to 0)
Correlation
Correlation is between -1
and 1
. Correlation near 1 means tight clustering, and correlation near 0 means loose clustering. r
is -1 if the points are on a line with negative slope, r
is positive 1 if the points are on a line with a positive slope. As |r|
gets closer to 1, the line points cluster more tightly around a line.
If x
is above average, we expect the y
to be above average if there's a strong correlation coefficient
Calculating r
by hand
Put the x
values into L1
, put the y
values into L2
.
- Convert the
x
each x value in the list to standard units(z
). Convert eachy
value to standard units. This will create two new tables containingz_x
andz_y
.
z = \frac{x-\bar{x}}{\sigma_x}
- Multiply the standard units for each (
z_x
,z_y
) pair in the sets, giving you a fifth list, namedp
in this example.
x * y = p
- Find the average of the values from step 3, this is
r
.
\bar{x}(p)
https://www.thoughtco.com/how-to-calculate-the-correlation-coefficient-3126228
Terminology
Term | Definition |
---|---|
r |
Correlation Coefficient |
Linear Correlation | Measures the strength of a line |
(Chapter 9, STAT 1040)
Correlation contd.
Notes
r
is a pure number, and does not have unitsr
does not change if you:- switch the
x
andy
values - add the same number to every x or y value
- multiply each
x
ory
value by a positive number
- switch the
- The correlation coefficient can be misleading in the presence of outliers or nonlinear association.
r
only shows the strength of a linear relationship.- High
r
only indicates high correlation, not causation. r
is not a linear, perfect scale. Anr
of 0.8 does not mean twice as much linearity as anr
of 0.4
Ecological Correlations
- Sometimes each point on the plot represents the average or rate for a whole group of individuals.
- Ecological correlations are artificially strong
- The size of points may indicate the size of the datapoints
Regression
(Chapter 10, STAT 1040)
Notes
Explanatory and Response Variables
- Regression uses values of one variable to predict values for a related value.
- The variable you are trying to predict is called the response variable. It is graphed along the y-axis. This is the thing being predicted/measured.
- The variable you have information about that you are using to make the prediction is called the explanatory variable. It is graphed along the x-axis. This is the treatment.
- Just because a relationship exists between
x
andy
does not mean that changes inx
cause changes iny
. - If the graph is given to you already set up, you already know the response and explanatory variables.
- The
\sigma
line will always always have a slope of:
\pm \frac{\sigma_y}{\sigma_x}
- The SD line always passes through the averages for each axis.
- It'll go through the middle of the "football"
(ave_x, ave_y)
is on the line- Visually looks like a line of best fit
- The SD line is not used for prediction because it over-predicts
- Someone who is exactly on the SD line is the same number of SDs above or below the average in the y axis as they are in the x axis.
Given a scatter diagram where the average of each set lies on the point
(75, 70)
, with a\sigma_x
of 10 and a\sigma_y
of 12, you can graph the SD line by going up\sigma_y
and right\sigma_x
, then connecting that point (in this example,(85, 82)
) with the mean points.
The Regression Line/Least Squared Regression Line (LSRL)
- This line has a more moderate slope than the SD line. it does not go through the peaks of the "football"
- Predictions can only be made if the data displays a linear association (is a football shape).
- The regression line is used to predict the y variable when the x variable is given
- In regression, the
x
variable is the known variable, andy
is the value being solved for. - The regression line goes through the point of averages, and can be positive or negative
slope = r(\frac{\sigma_y}{\sigma_x})
- You can find the regression line by multiplying
\sigma_y
byr
, for the rise, then using\sigma_x
for the run from the point of averages.
The below formula can be used to predict a y value given a 5 number summary of a set.
\hat{y} = \frac{x-\bar{x}}{\sigma_x} * r * \sigma_y + \bar{y}
- Find
z_x
- Multiply
z_x
byr
- Multiply that by
\sigma_y
- Add the average of
y
- For a positive association, for every
\sigma_x
above average we are inx
, the line predictsy
to be\sigma_y
standard deviations above y.x
The Regression Effect
- In a test-retest situation, people with low scores tend to improve, and people with high scores tend to do worse. This means that individuals score closer to the average as they retest.
- The regression fallacy is contributing this to something other than chance error.
Terminology
Term | Definition |
---|---|
\hat{y} |
The predicted value |