vault backup: 2025-01-07 18:14:44
This commit is contained in:
@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
|
||||
> **1.** The following function calls supposedly write a single new-line character, but some are incorrect. Identify which calls don't work and explain why.
|
||||
|
||||
b. `printf("%c", "\n");` - This is invalid because the double quotes make `\n` a string, but it's being displayed with the `%c`formatting specifier.
|
||||
c. `printf(%s, '\n');` - This is invalid because it's trying to display a `char` using the string formatting specifier.
|
||||
e. `printf('\n');` - `printf`'s first argument should be a string, not a `char`.
|
||||
h. `putchar("\n");` - `putchar`'s first argument should be a `char`, not a string.
|
||||
i. `puts('\n');` - `puts`'s first argument should be a string, not a `char`.
|
||||
j. `puts("\n");` - `puts` will write a newline after writing a string, so this will write two newlines.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
> **2.** Suppose that `p` has been declared as follows:
|
||||
```c
|
||||
char *p = "abc";
|
||||
```
|
||||
> Which of the following function calls are legal? Show the output produced by each legal call, and explain why all the others are illegal.
|
||||
```c
|
||||
// A - Not legal, because putchar accepts a `char`, not a pointer.
|
||||
putchar(p);
|
||||
// B - Legal, output: `a`
|
||||
putchar(*p);
|
||||
// C - Legal, output: `abc`
|
||||
puts(p)
|
||||
// D - Illegal, `puts` accepts a pointer to a null terminated string, not a `char`.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
> **3.** Suppose that we call `scanf` as follows:
|
||||
```c
|
||||
scanf("%d%s%d", &i, s, &j);
|
||||
```
|
||||
> If the user enters `12abc34` `56def78`, what will be the values of `i`, `s`, and `j` after the call? (Assume that `i` and `j` are `int` variables and `s` is an array of characters.)
|
||||
|
||||
- `i`: `12`
|
||||
- `s`: `"abc34"`
|
||||
- `j`: `56`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
> **7.** Suppose that `str` is an array of three characters. Which one of the following statements is not equivalent to the other three?
|
||||
```c
|
||||
// A
|
||||
*str = 0;
|
||||
// B
|
||||
str[0] = '\0';
|
||||
// C
|
||||
strcpy(str, "");
|
||||
// D
|
||||
strcat(str, "");
|
||||
```
|
||||
(d) is different because it effectively does nothing (concatenates `"abc"` with an empty string). The rest of them make `str` effectively empty by setting the first character to a null byte.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
> **9.** What will be the value of the string `s1` after the following statements have been executed?
|
||||
```c
|
||||
// Assuming `str` is an empty string with enough space to store everything:
|
||||
strcpy(str, "tire-bouchon");
|
||||
// "tire-bouchon"
|
||||
strcpy(&str[4], "d-or-wi");
|
||||
// "tired-or-wir"
|
||||
strcat(str, "red?");
|
||||
// "tired-or-wired?"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Expected output:
|
||||
```c
|
||||
"tired-or-wired?"
|
||||
```
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user