vault backup: 2024-11-15 14:03:25

This commit is contained in:
zleyyij 2024-11-15 14:03:25 -07:00
parent 6dc499f253
commit 0ba62cee12

View File

@ -108,11 +108,13 @@
- Enforcing political correctness can lead to widespread "preference falsification", in which what people believe in private is detached from what is spoken in public
- "preference falsification" can lead to polarization.
- In the example of social justice, many attribute poor social outcomes to factors *external* to the person, because then you can avoid directly blaming the person, an inherently uncomfortable discussion. Regardless of how correct the end result is, this tendency is still present.
- In promoting norms intended to benefit marginalized groups, we both help and hurt them
- In promoting norms intended to benefit marginalized groups, we both help and hurt them.
# Safe spaces, explained
- The author introduces the paper by showcasing some of the negative ways in which safe spaces are viewed and understood.
- The author then explains that safe spaces are a place where marginalized groups can feel welcome and accepted
- Distinction is made between psychological safety and physical safety
- The first usages of the term "safe space" came from the 1960s, where same sex relationships were outlawed, so a safe space was a place where people were able to practice same sex relationships without being noticed by the cops.
- Examples of situations where the classical term "safe space" still applies exist in areas where queer individuals
- Examples of situations where the classical term "safe space" still applies exist in areas where non-heteronormative behavior is outlawed or socially shamed.
- The same idea applies to other groups, like women, and people of color.
- One advocate for safe spaces states that they've found that being able to surround themselves with people of the same marginalized group makes it easier to be themselves.